
ESPR Article 2(27) defines a Substance of Concern as any substance that meets at least one of four criteria:
Today, more than 4600 substances fall within the ESPR definition. The number will rise further once new hazard classes for endocrine disruption, persistence, mobility, and bioaccumulation expand in 2026.
Some PFAS substances already meet one or more of these criteria, which has increased regulatory attention on their use in textiles. You can learn more in our article on PFAS in clothing.
These rules make chemical data foundational to sustainability and compliance. They shift the industry from voluntary best practice to mandatory transparency at both the company and product level. They also set a new global benchmark that other regions are likely to follow.
Two EU frameworks further define what SOC related information must be disclosed and where:
ESPR introduces mandatory sustainability requirements for almost all goods sold in the EU. For textiles, it requires:
ESPR will also set requirements for durability, repairability, environmental performance, and recyclability, in addition to the management of Substances of Concern.
This places chemicals, design, and circularity at the center of product development.
Under CSRD and ESRS E2 Pollution (based on the November 2025 version), companies must disclose information pertaining to SoCs or SVHCs. Entities active in the chemical sector shall report on the weight of SOCs and SVHCs procured, manufactured, placed on the market or emitted (into air, water and soil). Entities that manufacture, import or use articles containing SVHCs, mainly manufacturers and brands, must report on the names of such substances for those that are beyond the 0.1% concentration in articles or components that are procured or placed on the market. This is in line with the REACH regulation.
Examples of required disclosures for chemical producers include:
Together, ESPR and CSRD create a complete chain of accountability: from upstream chemical suppliers through manufacturers to finished products entering the EU market.
Most companies rely on Safety Data Sheets (SDS) that provide incomplete composition information. They rarely reveal full formulations, impurities, or detailed hazard profiles. As a result, many organizations may notcannot meet ESPR or CSRD expectations without a verified, standardized approach to chemical input management.
Meeting ESPR and CSRD requirements is non-negotiable for companies operating in the EU. The bluesign solution is designed to go further by supporting safer chemistry and responsible production beyond minimum compliance expectations.
bluesign enables companies to identify, manage, and report SoCs through verified chemical data, digital tools, and value chain collaboration.
Every bluesign approved chemical product undergoes assessment for:
This ensures SoC identification is based on verified primary data, not assumptions. Chemical suppliers maintain ownership of their data and submit it through bluesign tools for independent verification.
bluesign provides a suite of tools that prepare partners for ESPR and CSRD reporting.
Substance Navigator (bluesign Finder)
Helps users identify and flag SoCs within verified formulations.
Chemical Inventory List (CIL)
Captures site-level chemical usage and SoC presence and can be aggregated for brand-level reporting.
Impact Dashboard
Integrates SoC content, mass balance, and emissions data to support compliance and impact reporting.
Dimethylformamide (DMF) is a solvent commonly used in PU coatings for footwear materials. It is classified as toxic to reproduction and is therefore a Substance of Very High Concern. bluesign traces DMF from chemical suppliers through manufacturing to finished articles. This includes quantifying amounts present in materials and associated emissions. This type of verified primary data is essential for CSRD E2-5 disclosure and future Digital Product Passport entries.
Because SoCs must be tracked from chemical production to finished goods, collaboration across the supply chain is critical.
Chemical suppliers must provide full composition data and robust product stewardship.
Manufacturers and mills must maintain accurate CIL data and implement mass balance systems.
Brands and retailers must aggregate SoC information and disclose it in Digital Product Passports and corporate disclosures.
Many brands face additional challenges due to fragmented global supply chains and limited data access. Capacity building and harmonized digital systems help address these gaps.
Although the new regulations increase administrative and technical requirements, they also create opportunities. Companies that adopt verified data and clean input design early can:
With the multiplication of new regulations with unclear timelines, early action becomes a strategic priority.
The bluesign system provides a scalable, science-based infrastructure that supports both immediate reporting needs and long-term product transformation. Verified input data, digital tools, and value chain engagement prepare partners for a global future defined by transparency, clean chemistry, and circular product design.

This article was reviewed by Daniel Waterkamp, a chemical engineer and sustainability professional with a PhD in process engineering. As Head of bluesign Academy, Daniel oversees chemical compliance for international brands and helps develop safer, sustainable solutions for the textile industry. His expertise ensures the accuracy and relevance of the information presented.