
Under the 2015 Paris Agreement – the latest legally binding international treaty on climate change – 195 countries are committed to limit global temperature increase to well below 2.0 degrees Celsius (°C) and to strive for 1.5° C above pre-industrial levels. In 2018, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released a report that provides evidence that limiting warming below 1.5° C will significantly reduce climate impacts including drought, sea level rise, flooding, and extreme heat.
This level of ambition will require significant reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across the global economy leading to net zero emissions by 2050.
According to a recent joint report of the Global Fashion Agenda and McKinsey, the fashion sector contributed with around 2.1 billion tons of CO2, equal to 4.0% of the global GHG emissions in 2018. More than 70% of GHG emissions of the global apparel and footwear value chain result from upstream activities such as materials production and processing (Tier 2 and Tier 3 supplier stages). The remaining 30% are generated during downstream activities such as logistics, packaging, retail, product use, and end-of-use.
In the following section, the definitions for emission categories according to the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard are being used.
Scope 1 emissions are GHG emissions that occur from sources that are directly controlled or owned by the organization, i.e., emissions associated with on-site stationary fuel combustion or mobile fuel combustion (vehicle fleet).
Scope 2 emissions are indirect GHG emissions associated with the purchase of electricity, steam, heat, or cooling. Although scope 2 emissions physically occur at the facility where they are generated, they are accounted for in an organization’s GHG inventory, because they are a result of the organization’s energy use.
Scope 3 emissions are the result of activities from assets and services not owned or controlled by the reporting organization, but that the organization indirectly impacts in its value chain. Scope 3 emissions include, in total, 15 categories not within the organization’s scope 1 and 2 boundaries.

In this context, identification of decarbonization priorities and “low hanging fruits” should be in line with accurate calculated emission inventories. Measures with high leverage effects, low investments, and without big operational changes, along with reasonable assurances of cost recovery for new infrastructure, should be prioritized first. Awareness should be raised beforehand regarding any possible conflicts with stakeholders and customers. Therefore, it is worthwhile to mention that GHG emissions should not be the single criterion in decision-making.
The following subchapters provide information regarding opportunities for brands and retailers to have an influence on their Scope 1-3 emission inventories, with the focus on four key areas:
Upstream operations such as Tier 2 and Tier 3 suppliers are the most energy-intensive. Improvements in energy efficiency, transition to renewable energy, decarbonization of material production, and circular business models are key levers. Supplier evaluation should include environmental parameters alongside conventional ones. Streamlined data collection, close supplier partnerships, and decarbonization measures are essential.